PrecedentsA compilation of in-force House Admin rulings, as they are located. This list is not exhaustive!Amendments---To findings and definitions:QUOTE (Red @ 18 September 2009, 06:24 )

Findings cannot be amended, but Definitions can.
Appealing Decisions of the Chair---On calls to order:QUOTE (Red @ 09 September 2009, 08:53 )

It is and has been my interpretation that calling someone to order is not an actual ruling, and therefore not appealable, until the chair actually attempts to remove the person or take away their speaking privileges.
---Timing of motion and second:QUOTE (Red @ 07 July 2009, 16:24 )

The motion [to appeal] must be made and seconded within the 24 hour period.
Committees---Replacing members, counting votes:When a committee member is replaced, the new member may vote immediately. However,
if the outgoing member had already voted on any outstanding questions prior to being removed, the chair shall count the outgoing member's votes and discard the new member's votes (if applicable) on the same questions. The new member's votes should still be counted for all questions on which the outgoing member did not vote.
Co-Sponsorship---Unrestrictedness:QUOTE (Addie @ 30 April 2009, 23:09 )

Anyone is free to sign on as a co-sponsor while a bill is in the Hopper, and is as equally free to be a co-sponsor while the bill is up for debate.
End of Session---Bill status:QUOTE (Magruder @ 23 July 2008, 20:43)
[
Link on Old Boards]
In either Senate or House committees, any bill that has not made it completely through the committee process by session's end (i.e. completion of debate and voting) has, for all intents and purposeses, died in Committee. This means that the bill is returned in its original and unamended form to the respective Committee hopper to be dealt with from the beginning next session.
Similarly, on either the Senate or House floor, any bill that has not made it completely through the process of debate and voting on the floor will be returned in its pre-floor debate and post-Committee approval form to the respective folder in that chamber for next session.
---With a new president:QUOTE (Mitsuki @ 21 November 2007, 08:57)
[
Link on Old Boards]
Beginning this term, after a NEW President takes office, the House Majority Leader's office will be wiped clean, to prevent either party from "stacking" the HML Office with their bills.
Federal Budget---Force of law:QUOTE (Mitsuki Sanada @ 09 February 2009, 18:38 )

The Federal Budget is not a bill, it is technically a resolution. It has no force of law, neither does the Federal Budget change or supersede any law. Non-discretionary spending cannot be altered within the budget as their spending is mandated by federal law.
Motions to Appeal/Overturn---Chair's ability to voteQUOTE (Red @ 13 March 2010, 11:44)

Standing committee chairs are by rule considered voting members of the assembly (as opposed to, say, the chair of the Rules Committee, who does not get to vote, period), and all voting members -- the chair expressly included -- are allowed to vote on motions to appeal.
Passing the Gavel---Re-taking the gavel:QUOTE (Mitsuki Sanada @ 21 January 2009, 16:44 )

The Speaker cannot hand over the gavel and resume within the same debate [or docket], for future references.
Referring to Committee---Committee jurisdiction:QUOTE (Red @ 24 February 2010, 20:24 )

There is no rule of order preventing a bill from being referred to any specific committee if the body deems it appropriate.
---Senate-originated bills:QUOTE (Red @ 25 February 2010, 07:31 )

The House rule[s] should not be construed to disallow motions to commit on bills that have not previously been considered in a House committee.
Speaker Pro Tempore---Appointment of:QUOTE (Mitsuki @ 21 November 2007, 08:57)
[
Link on Old Boards]
The Speaker Pro Tempore must be publicly named by the Speaker of the House in order for the appointment to be recognised.
Sponsorship of Bills---Primary sponsor no longer in the House:QUOTE (Red @ 09 March 2010, 07:10 )

As long as the bill was submitted properly in the first place, the body may still consider it even if the primary sponsor is no longer a member of the House. [...] Although for the record, with the body's consent another member may take up primary sponsorship of the bill for the purposes of advocacy, accepting friendly amendments, etc.
Unanimous Consent---Bills not on docket:QUOTE (Mitsuki Sanada @ 09 December 2008, 18:36 )

Yes. You can't move to pass [a bill] via UC unless it's on the docket.
Vote Counts---Presiding officer's responsibilities:QUOTE (Red @ 09 September 2009, 15:35 )

On amendment and procedural votes, there is not necessarily a requirement that the chair post vote counts. If it looks obvious that one side has more votes, an eyeball test will often suffice. However, as per Robert's Rules, any one member has the right to request a vote count for any reason. If requested, the chair must provide a count -- while there's no hard-and-fast rule as to how soon it must be provided, a general rule of thumb is that everything should be cleared up before the bill moves to a final vote. This is to prevent having to stop a vote right in the middle of it in order to correct a previous mistake.
On final votes, the chair is always required to include vote counts because I use those counts when calculating the House Election warchests. Although no rules have been set in stone previously regarding a time frame, here's how we will deal with them ...
For all currently outstanding and future final votes, the bill is not considered to have officially passed or failed until the vote count is posted. That means the presiding officer is free to close the thread and announce which side had more votes, but until the numbers are provided, the bill may not be sent to the Senate, to the Conference Committee, or to the President's desk. ...
That doesn't mean a chair can choose to sit on one of the minority's bills indefinitely and refuse to announce the vote count in order to kill it, either. If I have reason to believe this is taking place, I will just call the results myself and reserve the right to impose harsh IG penalties at my discretion.